Mitogenome characterization and phylogenetic relationships of Turkish horses (Equus caballus)
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Research Article
E-PUB
26 November 2025

Mitogenome characterization and phylogenetic relationships of Turkish horses (Equus caballus)

Trakya Univ J Nat Sci. Published online 26 November 2025.
1. Erciyes University Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Kayseri, Türkiye
2. Erciyes University, Genome and Stem Cell Center (GenKök), Kayseri, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 07.08.2025
Accepted Date: 03.11.2025
E-Pub Date: 26.11.2025
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Abstract

Background

Horses (Equus caballus) have been selectively bred for numerous purposes since their domestication, leading to various breeds and increased genetic diversity within the species.

Aims

This study focused on the mitogenome characterization and phylogenetic relationships of Turkish feral (yılkı) and domestic horse breeds.

Methods

In this study, the whole mitogenomes of Turkish feral (yılkı) and domestic horse breeds were first amplified using long-range polymerase chain reaction, sequenced with ~4000× coverage on the Illumina MiSeq platform, and their phylogenetic relationships were subsequently analyzed.

Results

The mitogenomes of Turkish horses were 16657 base pairs in length, encompassing 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 22 transfer RNA (tRNA) genes, two ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes, one origin of replication (OL), and one non-coding control region (displacement-loop). In the mitogenomes, the ND6 gene and eight tRNAs (tRNAGln, tRNAAla, tRNAAsn, tRNACys, tRNATyr, tRNASer(UCN), tRNAGlu, and tRNAPro) were encoded on the light strand (L), while the origin of replication (OL), 12 PCGs, 14 tRNAs, and two rRNA genes were encoded on the heavy strand (H). A total of 45 gaps and 68 overlaps were identified in the intergenic regions of the assembled mitogenomes. In the Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic tree, the feral (yılkı) horse clustered within haplogroup A together with breeds from North America, the Middle East, Southern Europe, and Central Asia, while the domestic horse was clustered in haplogroup B together with breeds from Southern Europe and Central Europe.

Conclusion

This study significantly contributes to evolutionary biology, genetic diversity, and conservation by providing the first comprehensive mitogenome data for Turkish horses, establishing a foundational resource for future comparative and evolutionary genomic research.

Keywords:
Equus caballus, horse, mitogenome, next-generation sequencing, Türkiye

Introduction

Horses, belonging to the genus Equus (Mammalia: Perissodactyla: Equidae), were domesticated later than many other mammals. Although not definitive, archaeological and genetic evidence suggests that domestication occurred on the Eurasian steppes approximately 5,000–6,000 years ago (Lippold et al., 2011; Outram et al., 2009). Throughout history, horses have been primarily utilized for agriculture, transportation, sports, and military purposes, thereby enhancing mobility and trade, influencing warfare, and profoundly transforming human civilization (Levine, 2005; Outram et al., 2009). Selective breeding for traits such as strength, size, appearance, temperament, and endurance has driven intraspecific genetic differentiation and increased phenotypic variation among modern breeds (Lippold et al., 2011).

Due to its unique geographical position, Anatolia has served as a critical center for species domestication, animal migration, and transportation routes (MacHugh & Bradley, 2001; Naderi et al., 2008; Rezaei et al., 2010; Zeder, 2008). In Türkiye, the principal horse breeds include Arabian, Anatolian Native, Ayvacık Pony, Canik, Çamardı Kula, Cirit, Çukurova, Eastern Anatolian, Hınıs, Karacabey, Karakacan, Malakan, Thrace (Rumelia), Rahvan, Turkish-Arab, Turkish Nonius, and Uzunyayla (Bayram, 2005; Ozbeyaz & Akcapinar, 2010). In addition to these, there are also horses known as “yılkı,” which have been released into the wild, with their use declining due to increased mechanization in Anatolia (Hacan et al., 2018). Despite the rich diversity of native horse populations, the genetic variability of Anatolian horses remains insufficiently explored, and comprehensive studies are needed to uncover their evolutionary and historical contributions to global horse diversity.

Although numerous studies have analyzed complete mitochondrial DNA (mitogenomes) to investigate genetic diversity and population history in horses (Achilli et al., 2012; Ahlawat et al., 2025; Lippold et al., 2011; Sheikh et al., 2019; 2023), complete mitogenome data for horses in Türkiye are still lacking. Previous research on Turkish horses has mainly focused on morphological traits (Celik et al., 2015; Yilmaz, 2013), partial mtDNA regions (particularly the D-loop) (Koban et al., 2012; Köseman et al., 2019), and SSR-based analyses (Aksu et al., 2010; Koban et al., 2012; Koseman et al., 2020). Within the scope of the TURKHAYGEN-1 project, designated to genotype Anatolian domestic animals in Türkiye, 21 SSR markers and mtDNA D-loop sequences were analyzed across four horse breeds. This study revealed high allelic diversity and significant sequence variation (Koban et al., 2012). Similarly, a partial mtDNA (D-loop) study of 28 Turkish horses identified 42 polymorphic sites and 10 haplogroups (Köseman et al., 2019). The presence of repeat sequences in the mitochondrial D-loop region can affect the topology of phylogenetic trees; therefore, whole mitogenome sequencing provides a more reliable and comprehensive approach for assessing genetic diversity and elucidating phylogenetic relationships (Achilli et al., 2012). Sixteen mitogenome haplogroups (A–R) have been identified among 83 horse individuals distributed across Asia, Europe, the Middle East, and the Americas (Achilli et al., 2012).

The advent of next-generation sequencing technologies has enabled rapid and accurate characterization of mitochondrial genomes, which, being smaller and less complex than nuclear genomes, serves as highly effective molecular markers (Brankovics et al., 2017; Yong et al., 2015). The mitochondrial genome is widely employed in studies involving evolutionary analysis, genetic diversity, phylogeny, population structure, and taxonomy (Carpi et al., 2016; Delsuc et al., 2003; Hassanin et al., 2013; Olivieri et al., 2017; Ramos et al., 2018). Moreover, mitochondrial genomes provide critical insights for comparative and evolutionary genomic research (Carpi et al., 2016; Du et al., 2025; Olivieri et al., 2017; Ramos et al., 2018). In mammals, mitochondrial DNA typically ranges from 15 to 18 kilobases in length (Galtier et al., 2009; Jenuth et al., 1996; Saccone et al., 1999) and contains 37 genes, including 22 tRNAs, 2 rRNAs, and 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), and 1 non-coding control region (Galtier et al., 2009; Iborra et al., 2004).

Accordingly, the objectives of this study were to i) characterize the mitogenomes of Turkish domestic and feral (yılkı) horses, ii) establish a reference mitogenome database for Turkish horse populations, and iii) elucidate phylogenetic relationships among Turkish horses.

Materials and Methods

Sample Collection and Genomic DNA (gDNA) Isolation

Hair samples from one female feral (yılkı) and one domestic horse from Kayseri, Türkiye, were collected and preserved in absolute alcohol at −20 °C until genomic DNA extraction. gDNA was isolated using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Cat. No: 69504, QIAGEN) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The concentration of extracted gDNA was quantified using the dsDNA Quantification Broad Range kit (Cat. No: Q32850, Thermo Fisher Scientific). DNA purity and integrity were assessed by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel and spectrophotometric absorbance measurements. The extracted gDNA samples were subsequently used to amplify the entire mitochondrial genome in two overlapping fragments via long-range polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

PCR, Library Preparation, and Sequencing

The complete mitochondrial genome was amplified in two overlapping fragments using the long-range PCR method with NEB LongAmp® Taq 2X Master Mix (Cat. No: M0287S, NEB). Primer pairs AL1_2024L–BH1_13002H (~11,000 base pairs [bp]) and LuLu_12690L–LuLu_2503H (~6,500 bp) were used, as described by Ibis (2019). PCR reactions and cycling conditions were performed according to Ibis (2019). The concentration of the resulting amplicons was determined using the QuBit dsDNA HS Kit (Cat. No: Q32851, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and diluted to 0.2 ng/µL for sequencing library preparation. Sequencing libraries were prepared using the Illumina Nextera XT DNA Library Preparation Kit (Cat. No: FC-131-1096) and the Nextera XT Index Kit (Cat. No: FC-131-1002) (Illumina), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Library normalization was performed using a bead-based approach, and sequencing was conducted on the Illumina MiSeq platform (Genom and Stem Cell Center, GENKOK, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Türkiye) with the MiSeq Reagent Kit v2.

Bioinformatics Analyses

The raw sequencing reads were imported into Geneious Prime (https://www.geneious.com) for quality assessment, filtering, and subsequent analyses. Adapter sequences were removed from the raw reads, and both low-quality reads (quality score <25) and short reads (<50 bp) were discarded using the BBDuk trimming tool within Geneious Prime. The remaining high-quality reads were mapped against the reference mitochondrial genome (GenBank accession number NC_001640) using the Geneious Mapper algorithm, configured with highest sensitivity/medium parameters and fine-tuning for up to 25 iterations). Annotation information was transferred from the reference mitogenome and applied through Geneious Prime. To further validate the data, the raw reads were also subjected to de novo assembly using GetOrganelle software (Jin et al., 2020). Annotation boundaries were manually inspected and confirmed with MITOS2 (Donath et al., 2019) and tRNAscan-SE 2.0 Web Server (Lowe & Chan, 2016). Visualization of tRNA secondary structures was performed using the VARNA Java program (Darty et al., 2009), and circular representations of the mitogenome were generated with CG View web software (Grant & Stothard, 2008). The base composition of the mitogenomes was analyzed using Geneious Prime. Strand asymmetries were determined according to the following formulas: AT skew = [A-T]/[A + T] and GC skew = [G-C]/[G + C].

Phylogenetic Analyses

In addition to the newly obtained mitogenomes, a comparative dataset was assembled, comprising 31 horse mitogenomes and two outgroup mitogenomes from the genus Equus, all obtained from the GenBank database (National Center for Biotechnology Information) (Table 1). Sequence alignments was generated using the MAFFT algorithm (Katoh et al., 2002) implemented in Geneious Prime with default settings. Following alignment, the D-loop region characterized by a high mutation rate, repetitive motifs, and alignment ambiguities in mammals, was excluded from subsequent phylogenetic reconstruction. Ambiguous regions that introduced uncertainty into the dataset were further removed using the GBlocks v.0.91b program (Castresana, 2000) with default parameters. The optimal base substitution model was identified using jModelTest 2.1.10 (Darriba et al., 2012) based on the AIC criterion. Phylogenetic inference was performed using the Maximum Likelihood (ML) method in MEGA11 (Tamura et al., 2021) with 10,000 bootstrap replicates to assess node support.

Results

Characterization of Mitochondrial Genomes

Complete mitochondrial genomes (mitogenomes) of Turkish horses, each with a total length of 16,657 bp, were obtained at approximately 4000× coverage (Table 2) and deposited in the GenBank database under accession numbers PQ573014 and PQ573015 (Figure 1, Table 2). The mitogenomes obtained for both Turkish horses were identical in overall structure, including the lengths of regions and tRNA sequences, with variations restricted limited to mutations within gene regions. No insertion or deletion (InDel) sites were detected between the two mitogenomes. In the mitogenomes of Turkish horses, the ND6 and eight tRNAs (tRNAGln, tRNAAla, tRNAAsn, tRNACys, tRNATyr, tRNASer(UCN), tRNAGlu, and tRNAPro) were encoded on the light strand (L), while the OL origin, 12 PCGs, 14 tRNAs, and two rRNA genes were located on the heavy strand (H) (Figure 1, Table 3). The nucleotide composition results revealed that the mitogenomes of the feral (yılkı) and domestic horses were highly similar. In the feral (yılkı) horse, the nucleotide composition comprised 32.20% adenine (A), 25.90% thymine (T), 13.40% guanine (G), and 28.60% cytosine (C), while in the domestic horse, it consisted of 32.20% adenine (A), 25.80% thymine (T), 13.40% guanine (G), and 28.60% cytosine (C). Both mitogenomes exhibited identical A + T (58%) and G + C (42%) ratios (Table 4).

A total of 45 gaps and 68 overlaps were identified within the intergenic regions of the domestic and feral horse mitogenomes. The longest overlap, spanning 43 bp, was located between ATP8 and ATP6, whereas the longest gap, 8 bp in length, occurred between tRNASer and tRNAAsp (Table 3).

The combined length of the 13 PCG in the Turkish horses mitogenomes was 11401 bp, representing 68.42% of the total mitogenome length. These genes encoded 3,799 amino acids. Among the encoded amino acids, 4.3% were acidic, 6.9% basic, 11.2% charged, 29.3% polar uncharged, and 61.9% hydrophobic. Of the PCGs, 11 genes initiated with the “ATG” codon, whereas ND2 and ND3 began with ‘ATA’. The stop codon “TAA” was present in six genes, while “TAG” appeared in ND1, ND2, and ATP8, and “AGA” was found in CYTB. Incomplete stop codons were detected as “T—” in COX3 and ND4, and “TA-”in ND3 (Table 3). Codon usage frequencies in the Turkish horse mitogenomes are provided in Table 5. The most frequently used codons were “CUA” (285), “AUC” (208), “AUA” (186), and “UUC” (160), while the least frequent codon was “CGG” (3).

The total length of rRNA genes was 2556 bp comprising the 12S-rRNA (s-rRNA) was 976 bp and the 16S-rRNA (l-rRNA) was 1580 bp, located between tRNAPhe and tRNALeu(UUR), and separated by tRNAVal. The tRNA genes ranged in length from 60 to 75 bp. All tRNAs exhibited the typical cloverleaf secondary structure, except for tRNASer(AGY), which lacked a dihydrouridine (DHU) arm (Figure 2). The replication origin, 32 bp in length, was situated within the WANCY tRNA cluster. The control region (D-loop) measured 1,192 bp, making it the longest non-coding sequence in the mitogenome.

Phylogenetic Analyses

The mitogenomes of Turkish horses, together with those representing other horse haplogroups available in the GenBank database, were analyzed using the GTR + I substitution model under the ML method with 10,000 bootstrap replications (Table 1, Figure 3). In the resulting phylogenetic tree, the Turkish feral horse (yılkı) clustered with strong bootstrap support within Haplogroup A, grouping with other A haplogroup horses from various geographic regions, including North America (Chincoteague Pony, JN398377), the Middle East (Caspian Pony, Arab, and unidentified Syrian and Iranian breeds, JN398378, JN398384, JN398380, and JN398383), Southern Europe (Maremmano breed, JN398379, JN398381, and JN398382), and Central Asia (Akhal-Teke breed, JN398385). In contrast, the domestic Turkish horse was positioned with high bootstrap support within Haplogroup B, together with undefined Syrian breeds from the Middle East (JN398391 and JN398389), Maremmano and undefined Italian breeds from Southern Europe (JN398390, JN398387, and JN398388), and the Westphalian breed from Central Europe (JN398386).

Discussion

The two horse mitogenomes obtained in the present study exhibited structural features similar to previously reported horse mitogenomes (Achilli et al., 2012; Lippold et al., 2011; Luo et al., 2011; Sarkissian et al., 2015; Vilstrup et al., 2013), consisting of a circular molecule containing 37 gene regions (Figure 1, Table 2). According to the GenBank database, a total of 535 complete mitogenomes are currently available under the name Equus caballus, representing horse breeds from various regions worldwide, with lengths ranging from 16,403 to 16,681 bp (https://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/nuccore (txid9796[Organism:noexp]): Access date: 02.11.2024). The reference horse mitogenome (E. caballus) (NC_001640/X79547) has a total length of 16,660 bp (Xiufeng & Árnason, 1994), which closely corresponds to that of the Turkish horse breeds (16,657 bp). The variation in sequence length observed among existing horse mitogenomes is primarily attributed to differences in the length of the control region sequence. Although both modern and ancient horse mitogenomes have been reported, the mitogenomes of Turkish horses were previously unavailable and are presented here for the first time.

The general structural characteristics of the Turkish horse mitogenomes were consistent with those of other vertebrates. The nucleotide composition displayed a distinct bias toward Adenine and Thymine (58% A + T), a common feature in vertebrate mitogenomes. Similarly, the presence of numerous intergenic gaps (45 bp) and overlaps (68 bp) reflects the compact organization typical for horse and other vertebrate mitogenomes (Guo et al., 2016; Ibis, 2019; Krause et al., 2008; Rohland et al., 2007; Wada et al., 2010). The occurence of incomplete stop codons (“T--” in COX3 and ND4, and “TA-” in ND3) aligns with the reference horse mitogenome and other vertebrates (Ibis, 2019; Xiufeng & Árnason, 1994) where these codons function equivalently to complete stop codons (Ojala et al., 1981).

The codon usage pattern in Turkish horses, with “CUA,” “AUC,” and “AUA” being the most frequently used codons, was highly similar to that of the donkey mitogenome from Türkiye, suggesting a conserved codon usage pattern within the Equus genus (Ibis, 2019). The structural features of the tRNA genes in Turkish horses were also consistent with those typically observed in mammalian mitogenomes. The 22 identified tRNAs ranged from 60 to 75 bp in length, and all but one displayed the canonical cloverleaf secondary structure. The single exception, tRNASer(AGY), lacked the DHU arm, a variation that is known to be functionally acceptable (Steinberg & Cedergren, 1994). Furthermore, the lengths of the ribosomal RNA genes (976 bp for s-rRNA and 1,580 bp for l-rRNA) and the D-loop region (1,192 bp), were nearly identical to those ​​reported in the reference horse mitogenome (975 bp, 1,581 bp and 1,192 bp, respectively), indicating a high degree of structural conservation (Xiufeng & Árnason, 1994). The observed length differences among horse mitogenomes are mainly attributed to variations in the repeat regions within the D-loop, and it has been noted that variation in the number of repeat motifs within the D-loops, a regon known for its heteroplasmic nature (Xiufeng & Árnason, 1994).

In the ML phylogenetic tree reconstructed in this study, the Turkish horses mitogenomes clustered in accordance with the haplogroups defined by Achilli et al. (2012). The mitogenome of the Turkish feral horse grouped within Haplogroup A, whereas the domestic Turkish horse clustered within Haplogroup B. The findings indicate that the Turkish feral horse shares a common maternal lineage with other horses in Haplogroup A, which is widely distributed across global horse populations and may represent an ancient or broadly dispersed lineage. In contrast, the domestic Turkish horse’s placement in Haplogroup B suggests a distinct maternal lineage, likely reflecting differences in breeding history or geographical origin. Consistent with previous research, a previous study reported that the Przewalski horse in Eurasia possesses only the F and J-K lineages, with the greatest haplogroup diversity observed on the Asian continent (Achilli et al., 2012). The broad distribution of Haplogroup A across North America, the Middle East, and Central Asia supports the hypothesis of a shared evolutionary history among geographically distinct horse populations. Similarly, the inclusion of the Turkish domestic horse in Haplogroup B indicates connections with Central and Southern European populations. The identification of Haplogroup B in both Italy and East Asia (Achilli et al., 2012; Cardinali et al., 2016) further highlights its historical dissemination and emphasizes the pivotal role of Anatolia in horse domestication history. The domestication process, which originated in the Eurasian steppes and subsequently spread across various regions (Lippold et al., 2011; Outram et al., 2009), underscores Türkiye’s position as an integral part of this evolutionary and cultural pathway.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the complete mitochondrial genomes of Turkish horses, presented here for the first time, provide a valuable foundation for future genetic studies, including assessments of genetic diversity and conservation efforts within Türkiye. Further investigation of mitogenomic and genomic data from additional Turkish horse breeds, combined with comparative analyses across global datasets, will enhance understanding of horse evolutionary history and contribute to conservation strategies.

Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: This study was approved by the Erciyes University Local Ethic.s Committee for Animal Experiments (approval number: 23/061, dated: 05.04.2023).
Data Sharing Statement: All data are available within the study.
Conflict of Interest: The author(s) have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Funding: This study was supported by The Scientific Research Projects (BAP) of Erciyes University (Project No.: FBAÜ-2023-12262).

References

1
Achilli, A., Olivieri, A., Soares, P., Lancioni, H., Kashani, B. H., Perego, U. A., & Torroni, A. (2012). Mitochondrial genomes from modern horses reveal the major haplogroups that underwent domestication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109 (7), 2449–2454. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1111637109
2
Ahlawat, S., Sharma, U., Niranjan, S. K., Chhabra, P., Arora, R., Sharma, R., Singh, K. V., Vijh, R. K., & Mehta, S. C. (2025). Unraveling the maternal heritage: Identifying the complex origins of indigenous Indian horse and pony breeds through mitochondrial genome analysis. Mammalian Genome, 36 (1), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-024-09963-0
3
Aksu, S., Aktoprakligil, D., Koban, E., & Aslan, O. (2010). Genetic characterization of native horse breeds within the scope of protection of gene resources and biodiversity. Research Journal of Biological Sciences, 3 , 121–130. http://www.aensiweb.com/RJBS/
4
Bayram, D. (2005). The phenotypic characteristics of horses raised in Van region. Van Veterinary Journal, 16 (1), 85–88. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/vanvetj/issue/40274/487006
5
Brankovics, B., Dam, P., Rep, M., Hoog, G. S., Lee, J. A., Waalwijk, C., & Diepeningen, A. D. (2017). Mitochondrial genomes reveal recombination in the presumed asexual Fusarium oxysporum species complex. BMC Genomics, 18 , 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-4066-7
6
Cardinali, I., Lancioni, H., Giontella, A., Capodiferro, M. R., Capomaccio, S., Buttazzoni, L., Biggio, G. P., Cherchi, R., Albertini, E., Olivieri, A., Cappelli, K., Achilli, A., & Silvestrelli, M. (2016). An overview of ten Italian horse breeds through mitochondrial DNA. PLOS ONE, 11 (4), e0153004. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153004
7
Carpi, G., Kitchen, A., Kim, H. L., Ratan, A., Drautz-Moses, D. I., McGraw, J. J., & Schuster, S. C. (2016). Mitogenomes reveal diversity of the European Lyme borreliosis vector Ixodes ricinus in Italy. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 101 , 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2016.05.028
8
Castresana, J. (2000). Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 17 (4), 540–552. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026334
9
Celik, S., Coskun, F., & Yilmaz, O. (2015). Investigation by different orthogonal methods of body sizes of Turkish spotted horses according to age group. COMU Journal of Agriculture Faculty, 3 (1), 81–87. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/comuagri/issue/27156/285456
10
Darriba, D., Taboada, G. L., Doallo, R., & Posada, D. (2012). jModelTest 2: More models, new heuristics and high-performance computing. Nature Methods, 9 (8), 772. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2109
11
Darty, K., Denise, A., & Ponty, Y. (2009). VARNA: Interactive drawing and editing of the RNA secondary structure. Bioinformatics, 25 (15), 1974–1975. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp250
12
Delsuc, F., Stanhope, M. J., & Douzery, E. J. P. (2003). Molecular systematics of armadillos (Xenarthra, Dasypodidae): Contribution of maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses of mitochondrial and nuclear genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 28 (2), 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1055-7903(03)00036-8
13
Donath, A., Jühling, F., Al-Arab, M., Bernhart, S. H., Reinhardt, F., Stadler, P. F., & Bernt, M. (2019). Improved annotation of protein-coding genes boundaries in metazoan mitochondrial genomes. Nucleic Acids Research, 47 (20), 10543–10552. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz833
14
Du, W., Sun, Q., Hu, S., Yu, P., Kan, S., & Zhang, W. (2025). Equus mitochondrial pangenome reveals independent domestication imprints in donkeys and horses. Scientific Reports, 15 (1), 6803. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-65526-6
15
Galtier, N., Nabholz, B., Glémin, S., & Hurst, G. D. D. (2009). Mitochondrial DNA as a marker of molecular diversity: A reappraisal. Molecular Ecology, 18 (22), 4541–4550. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04380.x
16
Grant, J. R., & Stothard, P. (2008). The CGView server: A comparative genomics tool for circular genomes. Nucleic Acids Research, 36 (suppl_2), 181–184. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn179
17
Guo, X., Pei, J., Chu, M., Wu, X., Bao, P., Ding, X., & Yan, P. (2016). The complete mitochondrial genome of Hequ horse. Mitochondrial DNA Part A, 27 (6), 4657–4658. https://doi.org/10.3109/19401736.2015.1101548
18
Hacan, Ö., Koçak, S., Çelikeoğlu, K., Bozkurt, Z., Erdoğan, M., & Tekerli, M. (n.d.). The independent spirit of Turkey: Wild horse.
19
Hassanin, A., An, J., Ropiquet, A., Nguyen, T. T., & Couloux, A. (2013). Combining multiple autosomal introns for studying shallow phylogeny and taxonomy of Laurasiatherian mammals: Application to the tribe Bovini. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 66 (3), 766–775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2012.11.003
20
Ibis, O. (2019). Türkiye Anadolu Eşeği ( Equus asinus )’nin mitogenom karakterizasyonu ve filogenetik ilişkileri. Türkiye Tarımsal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6 (3), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.19159/tutad.460381
21
Iborra, F. J., Kimura, H., & Cook, P. R. (2004). The functional organization of mitochondrial genomes in human cells. BMC Biology, 2 , 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-2-9
22
Jenuth, J. P., Peterson, A. C., Fu, K., & Shoubridge, E. A. (1996). Random genetic drift in the female germline explains the rapid segregation of mammalian mitochondrial DNA. Nature Genetics, 14 (2), 146–151. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1096-146
23
Jin, J. J., Yu, W. B., Yang, J. B., Song, Y., DePamphilis, C. W., Yi, T. S., & Li, D. Z. (2020). GetOrganelle: A fast and versatile toolkit for accurate de novo assembly of organelle genomes. Genome Biology, 21 , 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-020-02154-5
24
Katoh, K., Misawa, K., Kuma, K. I., & Miyata, T. (2002). MAFFT: A novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Research, 30 (14), 3059–3066. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkf436
25
Koban, E., Denizci, M., Aslan, O., Aktoprakligil, D., Aksu, S., Bower, M., & Arat, S. (2012). High microsatellite and mitochondrial diversity in Anatolian native horse breeds shows Anatolia as a genetic conduit between Europe and Asia. Animal Genetics, 43 (4), 401–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2011.02284.x
26
Koseman, A., Ozsensoy, Y., Erdogan, M., Yarali, C., Toprak, B., Zengin, K., & Seker, I. (2020). Investigation of genetic variations using microsatellite markers in colored horses in Turkey. Russian Journal of Genetics, 56 , 592–602. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795420040073
27
Köseman, A., Ozsensoy, Y., Erdogan, M., Yaralı, C., Toprak, B., Zengin, K., & Şeker, İ. (2019). Investigation of genetic structures of coloured horses by mtDNA D-loop sequence analysis in Turkey. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 25 (6), 769–778. https://doi.org/10.9775/kvfd.2019.22056
28
Krause, J., Unger, T., Noçon, A., Malaspinas, A. S., Kolokotronis, S. O., Stiller, M., & Hofreiter, M. (2008). Mitochondrial genomes reveal an explosive radiation of extinct and extant bears near the Miocene–Pliocene boundary. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 8 , 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-224
29
Levine, M. A. (2005). Domestication and early history of the horse. In The domestic horse: The origins, development and management of its behaviour. Cambridge University Press.
30
Lippold, S., Matzke, N. J., Reissmann, M., & Hofreiter, M. (2011). Whole mitochondrial genome sequencing of domestic horses reveals incorporation of extensive wild horse diversity during domestication. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 11 , 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-11-147
31
Lowe, T. M., & Chan, P. P. (2016). tRNAscan-SE online: Integrating search and context for analysis of transfer RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Research, 44 (W1), 54–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw413
32
Luo, Y., Chen, Y., Liu, F., Jiang, C., & Gao, Y. (2011). Mitochondrial genome sequence of the Tibetan wild ass ( Equus kiang ). Mitochondrial DNA, 22 (1–2), 6–8. https://doi.org/10.3109/10425171003618702
33
MacHugh, D. E., & Bradley, D. G. (2001). Livestock genetic origins: Goats buck the trend. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98 (10), 5382–5384. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.101126598
34
Naderi, S., Rezaei, H. R., Pompanon, F., Blum, M. G., Negrini, R., Naghash, H. R., & Taberlet, P. (2008). The goat domestication process inferred from large-scale mitochondrial DNA analysis of wild and domestic individuals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105 (46), 17659–17664. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804782105
35
Ojala, D., Montoya, J., & Attardi, G. (1981). tRNA punctuation model of RNA processing in human mitochondria. Nature, 290 (5806), 470–474. https://doi.org/10.1038/290470a0
36
Olivieri, A., Sidore, C., Achilli, A., Angius, A., Posth, C., Furtwängler, A., & Torroni, A. (2017). Mitogenome diversity in Sardinians: A genetic window onto an island’s past. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 34 (5), 1230–1239. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msx086
37
Outram, A. K., Stear, N. A., Bendrey, R., Olsen, S., Kasparov, A., Zaibert, V., & Evershed, R. P. (2009). The earliest horse harnessing and milking. Science, 323 (5919), 1332–1335. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1168594
38
Ozbeyaz, C., & Akcapinar, H. (2010). Course notes of horse breeding. Ankara University Faculty of Veterinary Medicine.
39
Ramos, B., González-Acuña, D., Loyola, D. E., Johnson, W. E., Parker, P. G., Massaro, M., & Vianna, J. A. (2018). Landscape genomics: Natural selection drives the evolution of mitogenome in penguins. BMC Genomics, 19 , 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4840-7
40
Rezaei, H. R., Naderi, S., Chintauan-Marquier, I. C., Taberlet, P., Virk, A. T., Naghash, H. R., & Pompanon, F. (2010). Evolution and taxonomy of the wild species of the genus Ovis (Mammalia, Artiodactyla, Bovidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 54 (2), 315–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2009.09.008
41
Rohland, N., Malaspinas, A. S., Pollack, J. L., Slatkin, M., Matheus, P., & Hofreiter, M. (2007). Proboscidean mitogenomics: Chronology and mode of elephant evolution using mastodon as outgroup. PLoS Biology, 5 (8), 207. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050207
42
Saccone, C., Giorgi, C., Gissi, C., Pesole, G., & Reyes, A. (1999). Evolutionary genomics in Metazoa: The mitochondrial DNA as a model system. Gene, 238 (1), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1119(99)00270-X
43
Sarkissian, C., Vilstrup, J. T., Schubert, M., Seguin-Orlando, A., Eme, D., Weinstock, J., & Orlando, L. (2015). Mitochondrial genomes reveal the extinct Hippidion as an outgroup to all living equids. Biology Letters, 11 (3), 20141058. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2014.1058
44
Sheikh, A., Ahmed, M. M. M., Mutawakil, M. H. Z., Saini, K. S., Alsulaimany, F. A., Hanafy, A., & Sabir, J. S. M. (2019). SNP mapping and phylogenetic analysis of Saudi Arabian horse breeds based on mitochondrial genome sequencing. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, 58 , 225–230.
45
Sheikh, A. (2023). Mitochondrial DNA sequencing of Kehilan and Hamdani horses from Saudi Arabia. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 30 (9), 103741. http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/51265
46
Steinberg, S., & Cedergren, R. (1994). Structural compensation in atypical mitochondrial tRNAs. Nature Structural Biology, 1 (8), 507–510. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsb0894-507
47
Tamura, K., Stecher, G., & Kumar, S. (2021). MEGA11: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 38 (7), 3022–3027. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab120
48
Vilstrup, J. T., Seguin-Orlando, A., Stiller, M., Ginolhac, A., Raghavan, M., Nielsen, S. C., & Orlando, L. (2013). Mitochondrial phylogenomics of modern and ancient equids. PLOS ONE, 8 (2), 55950. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055950
49
Wada, K., Okumura, K., Nishibori, M., Kikkawa, Y., & Yokohama, M. (2010). The complete mitochondrial genome of the domestic red deer ( Cervus elaphus ) of New Zealand and its phylogenic position within the family Cervidae. Animal Science Journal, 81 (5), 551–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2010.00762.x
50
Xiufeng, X., & Árnason, Ú. (1994). The complete mitochondrial DNA sequence of the horse, Equus caballus : Extensive heteroplasmy of the control region. Gene, 148 (2), 357–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(94)90766-3
51
Xu, X., Gullberg, A., & Arnason, U. (1996). The complete mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) of the donkey and mtDNA comparisons among four closely related mammalian species-pairs. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 43 , 438–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02337515
52
Yilmaz, O. (2013). Two new genetic sources specific to Ardahan–Igdir–Kars Basin: Colored horse and Dikkulak dog. Turkey-Kars Governorship International Sarıkamış Symposium. https://www.sariktur.org.tr/
53
Yong, H. S., Song, S. L., Lim, P. E., Chan, K. G., Chow, W. L., & Eamsobhana, P. (2015). Complete mitochondrial genome of Bactrocera arecae (Insecta: Tephritidae) by next-generation sequencing and molecular phylogeny of Dacini tribe. Scientific Reports, 5 (1), 15155. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15155
54
Zeder, M. A. (2008). Domestication and early agriculture in the Mediterranean Basin: Origins, diffusion, and impact. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105 (33), 11597–11604. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0801317105